Local Berkeley Rent Stabilization Board Avery Arbaugh · 6 groups
1 Carole A. Marasovic · 1 group
Carole Marasovic · 1 group
Derek Rodriguez · 5 groups
5 Nathan Mizell · 6 groups
3 One square per group. A group backing two candidates counts for each.
Filtered: 56 of 56 endorsers
Report an error in Berkeley Rent Stabilization Board – Not listed– Not listed– Not listedAvery Arbaugh, Ida Martinac, Carole A. Marasovic, Nathan Mizell, Vylma Ortiz (source for Berkeley Rent Stabilization Board) Checked October 5 Avery Arbaugh, Ida Martinac, Vylma Ortiz, Derek Rodriguez, Nathan Mizell (source for Berkeley Rent Stabilization Board) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listedCarole Marasovic (source for Berkeley Rent Stabilization Board) Ida Martinac, Nathan Mizell, Avery Arbaugh, Vylma Ortiz, Derek Rodriguez (source for Berkeley Rent Stabilization Board) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed#1 Avery Arbaugh, #2 Ida Martinac, #3 Nathan Mizell, #4 Vylma Ortiz, #5 Derek Rodriguez (source for Berkeley Rent Stabilization Board) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listedAvery Arbaugh, Ida Martinac, Nathan Mizell, Vylma Ortiz, Derek Rodriguez (source for Berkeley Rent Stabilization Board) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listedAvery Arbaugh, Ida Martinac, Nathan Mizell, Vylma Ortiz, Derek Rodriguez (source for Berkeley Rent Stabilization Board) – Not listedBerkeley Unified School Board Jennifer Shanoski · 4 groups
Ka’Dijah A. Brown · 1 group
Ka’Dijah Brown · 2 groups
One square per group. A group backing two candidates counts for each.
Filtered: 56 of 56 endorsers
Report an error in Berkeley Unified School Board – Not listed– Not listed– Not listedKa’Dijah A. Brown, Sandy Park, Jennifer Shanoski (source for Berkeley Unified School Board) Checked October 5 Ka’Dijah Brown, Sandy Park, Jennifer Shanoski (source for Berkeley Unified School Board) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listedKa’Dijah Brown, Sandy Park, Jennifer Shanoski (source for Berkeley Unified School Board) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listedKa'Dijah Brown, Sandy Park, Jennifer Shanoski (source for Berkeley Unified School Board) – Not listedBerkeley City Council, District 1 Daria Wrubel · 5 groups
1 1 Moni Gangopadhyay · 3 groups
2 2 One square per group. A group backing two candidates counts for each.
Filtered: 56 of 56 endorsers
Your pick for Berkeley City Council, District 1 · Rank up to 5 Undecided Not on my ballot
1st choice Choose Laura Babitt Ross Bernet Moni Gangopadhyay Steve Kromer Daria Wrubel Write-in 2nd choice Choose Laura Babitt Ross Bernet Moni Gangopadhyay Steve Kromer Daria Wrubel Write-in 3rd choice Choose Laura Babitt Ross Bernet Moni Gangopadhyay Steve Kromer Daria Wrubel Write-in 4th choice Choose Laura Babitt Ross Bernet Moni Gangopadhyay Steve Kromer Daria Wrubel Write-in 5th choice Choose Laura Babitt Ross Bernet Moni Gangopadhyay Steve Kromer Daria Wrubel Write-in
Write-in name
Report an error in Berkeley City Council, District 1 – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listedDaria Wrubel & Moni Gangopadhyay (dual) (source for Berkeley City Council, District 1) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listedRoss Bernet (source for Berkeley City Council, District 1) #1 Daria Wrubel, #2 Moni Gangopadhyay (source for Berkeley City Council, District 1) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listedRoss Bernet (source for Berkeley City Council, District 1) – Not listedDaria Wrubel (source for Berkeley City Council, District 1) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listedDaria Wrubel (source for Berkeley City Council, District 1) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed#1 Daria Wrubel, #2 Moni Gangopadhyay (source for Berkeley City Council, District 1) – Not listedBerkeley City Council, District 4 One square per group. A group backing two candidates counts for each.
Filtered: 56 of 56 endorsers
Your pick for Berkeley City Council, District 4 · Rank up to 3 Undecided Not on my ballot
1st choice Choose Majdi "Gaith" Abuhamdieh Igor A. Tregub Write-in 2nd choice Choose Majdi "Gaith" Abuhamdieh Igor A. Tregub Write-in 3rd choice Choose Majdi "Gaith" Abuhamdieh Igor A. Tregub Write-in
Write-in name
Report an error in Berkeley City Council, District 4 – Not listed– Not listed– Not listedIgor Tregub (source for Berkeley City Council, District 4) Checked October 5 Igor Tregub (source for Berkeley City Council, District 4) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listedIgor Tregub (source for Berkeley City Council, District 4) Igor Tregub (source for Berkeley City Council, District 4) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listedIgor Tregub (source for Berkeley City Council, District 4) – Not listedIgor Tregub (source for Berkeley City Council, District 4) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listedIgor Tregub (source for Berkeley City Council, District 4) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listedNo endorsement (source for Berkeley City Council, District 4) – Not listedBerkeley City Council, District 7 One square per group. A group backing two candidates counts for each.
Filtered: 56 of 56 endorsers
Your pick for Berkeley City Council, District 7 · Rank up to 3 Undecided Not on my ballot
1st choice Choose Aidan Hill Syrak Micael Write-in 2nd choice Choose Aidan Hill Syrak Micael Write-in 3rd choice Choose Aidan Hill Syrak Micael Write-in
Write-in name
Report an error in Berkeley City Council, District 7 – Not listedSyrak Micael (source for Berkeley City Council, District 7) – Not listedSyrak Micael (source for Berkeley City Council, District 7) Checked October 5 Syrak Micael (source for Berkeley City Council, District 7) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listedSyrak Micael (source for Berkeley City Council, District 7) Syrak Micael (source for Berkeley City Council, District 7) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listedSyrak Micael (source for Berkeley City Council, District 7) – Not listedSyrak Micael (source for Berkeley City Council, District 7) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listedSyrak Micael (source for Berkeley City Council, District 7) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listedSyrak Micael (source for Berkeley City Council, District 7) – Not listedBerkeley City Council, District 8 Michael Wallman · 1 group
One square per group. A group backing two candidates counts for each.
Filtered: 56 of 56 endorsers
Your pick for Berkeley City Council, District 8 · Rank up to 5 Undecided Not on my ballot
1st choice Choose Fred M. Feller Mark Humbert Mari Mendonca Michael Wallman Write-in 2nd choice Choose Fred M. Feller Mark Humbert Mari Mendonca Michael Wallman Write-in 3rd choice Choose Fred M. Feller Mark Humbert Mari Mendonca Michael Wallman Write-in 4th choice Choose Fred M. Feller Mark Humbert Mari Mendonca Michael Wallman Write-in 5th choice Choose Fred M. Feller Mark Humbert Mari Mendonca Michael Wallman Write-in
Write-in name
Report an error in Berkeley City Council, District 8 – Not listed– Not listed– Not listedMark Humbert (source for Berkeley City Council, District 8) Checked October 5 – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listedMark Humbert (source for Berkeley City Council, District 8) Mark Humbert (source for Berkeley City Council, District 8) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listedMark Humbert (source for Berkeley City Council, District 8) – Not listedMark Humbert (source for Berkeley City Council, District 8) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listedMichael Wallman (source for Berkeley City Council, District 8) – Not listedBerkeley City Auditor One square per group. A group backing two candidates counts for each.
Filtered: 56 of 56 endorsers
Your pick for Berkeley City Auditor · Rank up to 2 Undecided
1st choice Choose Jenny Wong Write-in 2nd choice Choose Jenny Wong Write-in
Write-in name
Report an error in Berkeley City Auditor – Not listed– Not listed– Not listedJenny Wong (source for Berkeley City Auditor) Checked October 5 – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listedJenny Wong (source for Berkeley City Auditor) Jenny Wong (source for Berkeley City Auditor) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listedJenny Wong (source for Berkeley City Auditor) – Not listedMeasure U – Bond On your ballot: Shall the measure authorizing issuance of $300,000,000 in general obligation bonds to fund acquisition and improvement of fire stations, emergency response facilities, parks and recreation facilities, and other public infrastructure and facilities, and increase climate resiliency, subject to independent oversight and audits, be adopted? Financial Implications: Average annual taxpayer costs over projected 40 years bonds are outstanding are approximately $22.14 per $100,000 assessed property value; generating approximately $15,200,000/year.
8 groups say Yes. 0 say No.
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
✓ 8 Yes ✗ 0 No – 0 No position
Filtered: 56 of 56 endorsers
Report an error in Measure U – Bond – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Measure U – Bond) Checked October 5 ✓ Yes (source for Measure U – Bond) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Measure U – Bond) ✓ Yes (source for Measure U – Bond) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Measure U – Bond) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Measure U – Bond) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Measure U – Bond) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Measure U – Bond) – Not listedMeasure V – Sales Tax On your ballot: Shall the measure levying a 0.5% sales tax in Berkeley, increasing the total sales tax rate in the City to 10.75%, estimated to generate $9,000,000 to $10,000,000 annually, with proceeds placed into the General Fund for general City uses, including but not limited to sustaining fire, police and 911 dispatch services, youth and senior services, and community programs, until ended by the voters, with independent audits, be adopted?
7 groups say Yes. 0 say No.
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ –
✓ 7 Yes ✗ 0 No – 1 No position
Filtered: 56 of 56 endorsers
Report an error in Measure V – Sales Tax – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Measure V – Sales Tax) Checked October 5 ✓ Yes (source for Measure V – Sales Tax) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Measure V – Sales Tax) ✓ Yes (source for Measure V – Sales Tax) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Measure V – Sales Tax) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Measure V – Sales Tax) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Measure V – Sales Tax) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– No recommendation (source for Measure V – Sales Tax) – Not listedMeasure W – Charter Amendment On your ballot: Shall the measure amending the City Charter to reduce candidate filing fees; eliminate signatures in lieu of filing fee process; eliminate certain personal information from candidate statements; clarify and revise initiative, referendum and recall processes; amend election timelines for filling Mayor and Councilmember vacancies; increase the maximum amount from the public campaign financing fund for administration and enforcement from $250,000 to $400,000 per four-year election cycle; and make other changes be adopted?
6 groups say Yes. 0 say No.
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
✓ 6 Yes ✗ 0 No – 0 No position
Filtered: 56 of 56 endorsers
Report an error in Measure W – Charter Amendment – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Measure W – Charter Amendment) Checked October 5 – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Measure W – Charter Amendment) ✓ Yes (source for Measure W – Charter Amendment) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Measure W – Charter Amendment) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Measure W – Charter Amendment) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Measure W – Charter Amendment) – Not listedMeasure X – Rent Ordinance Amendment On your ballot: Shall the measure to amend the Rent Stabilization and Eviction for Just Cause Ordinance by making most rent control and registration exemptions inapplicable to units that were not exempt when the current tenancy began; allowing modification or waiver of fees for subsidized units owned or leased by nonprofits; changing the annual registration deadline; limiting annual rent increases to ten percent; and allowing tenant associations in smaller properties, be adopted?
8 groups say Yes. 0 say No.
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
✓ 8 Yes ✗ 0 No – 0 No position
Filtered: 56 of 56 endorsers
Report an error in Measure X – Rent Ordinance Amendment – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Measure X – Rent Ordinance Amendment) Checked October 5 – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Measure X – Rent Ordinance Amendment) ✓ Yes (source for Measure X – Rent Ordinance Amendment) ✓ Yes (source for Measure X – Rent Ordinance Amendment) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Measure X – Rent Ordinance Amendment) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Measure X – Rent Ordinance Amendment) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Measure X – Rent Ordinance Amendment) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Measure X – Rent Ordinance Amendment) – Not listedMeasure Y – Initiative - Arts Tax On your ballot: Shall the measure creating a special parcel tax to fund grants for performing arts organizations, art projects, art organization operational and programmatic expenses and capital projects, community festivals, and administrative costs, with oversight by the City's Civic Arts Commission, at a rate of $0.07 per square foot of improvements, estimated to generate approximately $6,300,000 annually and $84,800,000 over its twelve-year duration, be adopted?
6 groups say Yes. 0 say No.
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ –
✓ 6 Yes ✗ 0 No – 1 No position
Filtered: 56 of 56 endorsers
Report an error in Measure Y – Initiative - Arts Tax – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Measure Y – Initiative - Arts Tax) Checked October 5 ✓ Yes (source for Measure Y – Initiative - Arts Tax) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Measure Y – Initiative - Arts Tax) ✓ Yes (source for Measure Y – Initiative - Arts Tax) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– No position (source for Measure Y – Initiative - Arts Tax) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Measure Y – Initiative - Arts Tax) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Measure Y – Initiative - Arts Tax) – Not listedMeasure Z – Initiative - Public Bank On your ballot: Shall the measure creating a special parcel tax to capitalize and support a public bank to fund investments in affordable housing, green energy/infrastructure and small businesses, at rates of $0.06/square foot of residential improvements and $0.09/square foot of non-residential improvements, estimated to generate approximately $9,200,000 the first year and $58,300,000 over its six-year duration, with funds subject to review, allocation and approval by the City Council and regular audits, be adopted?
7 groups say Yes. 1 says No.
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✗ –
✓ 7 Yes ✗ 1 No – 1 No position
Filtered: 56 of 56 endorsers
Report an error in Measure Z – Initiative - Public Bank – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Measure Z – Initiative - Public Bank) Checked October 5 ✓ Yes (source for Measure Z – Initiative - Public Bank) – Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Measure Z – Initiative - Public Bank) ✗ No (source for Measure Z – Initiative - Public Bank) ✓ Yes (source for Measure Z – Initiative - Public Bank) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Measure Z – Initiative - Public Bank) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Neutral (source for Measure Z – Initiative - Public Bank) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Measure Z – Initiative - Public Bank) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Measure Z – Initiative - Public Bank) – Not listedMeasure AA – Initiative - Soda Tax On your ballot: Shall the measure replacing the City's $0.01 per fluid ounce general tax on the distribution of sugar-sweetened beverages with a $0.02 per fluid ounce special tax to fund public health, nutrition, and drinking water accessibility programs by nonprofits, the City, or Berkeley Unified School District, retaining current exemptions for small retailers, milk products, baby formula, alcoholic beverages, and medical and weight-loss products, estimated to generate approximately $2,200,000 annually, until repealed by the voters, be adopted?
6 groups say Yes. 0 say No.
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
✓ 6 Yes ✗ 0 No – 0 No position
Filtered: 56 of 56 endorsers
Report an error in Measure AA – Initiative - Soda Tax – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Measure AA – Initiative - Soda Tax) Checked October 5 – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Measure AA – Initiative - Soda Tax) ✓ Yes (source for Measure AA – Initiative - Soda Tax) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Measure AA – Initiative - Soda Tax) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Measure AA – Initiative - Soda Tax) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Measure AA – Initiative - Soda Tax) – Not listedState Governor Read more: CalMatters voter guide (opens in a new tab) · Los Angeles Times voter guide (opens in a new tab)
No endorsement · 2 groups
Xavier Becerra · 20 groups
One square per group. A group backing two candidates counts for each.
Filtered: 56 of 56 endorsers
Report an error in Governor – Not listedXavier Becerra (source for Governor) – Not listedXavier Becerra (source for Governor) Checked October 5 Xavier Becerra (source for Governor) Xavier Becerra (source for Governor) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listedXavier Becerra (source for Governor) Xavier Becerra (source for Governor) Checked October 2 – Not listedSteve Hilton (source for Governor) Xavier Becerra (source for Governor, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com Steve Hilton (source for Governor) Checked October 8 – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listedXavier Becerra (source for Governor, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com Xavier Becerra (source for Governor) – Not listedXavier Becerra (source for Governor) Xavier Becerra (source for Governor) No endorsement (source for Governor) Steve Hilton (source for Governor) Xavier Becerra (source for Governor) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listedXavier Becerra (source for Governor) Xavier Becerra (source for Governor) Xavier Becerra (source for Governor) Checked October 7 Steve Hilton (source for Governor) Checked October 7 Xavier Becerra (source for Governor) – Not listed– Not listedXavier Becerra (source for Governor) Checked October 11 – Not listed– Not listedNo endorsement (source for Governor) – Not listedXavier Becerra (source for Governor) – Not listedSteve Hilton (source for Governor) – Not listed– Not listedXavier Becerra (source for Governor) – Not listedXavier Becerra (source for Governor) – Not listedLieutenant Governor Read more: CalMatters voter guide (opens in a new tab) · Los Angeles Times voter guide (opens in a new tab)
No endorsement · 2 groups
One square per group. A group backing two candidates counts for each.
Filtered: 56 of 56 endorsers
Report an error in Lieutenant Governor – Not listed– Not listed– Not listedFiona Ma (source for Lieutenant Governor) Checked October 5 Fiona Ma (source for Lieutenant Governor) Fiona Ma (source for Lieutenant Governor) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listedFiona Ma (source for Lieutenant Governor) Fiona Ma (source for Lieutenant Governor) Checked October 2 Fiona Ma (source for Lieutenant Governor) Gloria Romero (source for Lieutenant Governor) Fiona Ma (source for Lieutenant Governor, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com Gloria Romero (source for Lieutenant Governor) Checked October 8 – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listedFiona Ma (source for Lieutenant Governor, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com Fiona Ma (source for Lieutenant Governor) – Not listed– Not listedFiona Ma (source for Lieutenant Governor) No endorsement (source for Lieutenant Governor) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listedFiona Ma (source for Lieutenant Governor) Fiona Ma (source for Lieutenant Governor) Fiona Ma (source for Lieutenant Governor) Checked October 7 Gloria Romero (source for Lieutenant Governor) Checked October 7 Fiona Ma (source for Lieutenant Governor) – Not listedFiona Ma (source for Lieutenant Governor, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com Checked October 5 Fiona Ma (source for Lieutenant Governor) Checked October 11 – Not listed– Not listedNo endorsement (source for Lieutenant Governor) – Not listedFiona Ma (source for Lieutenant Governor) – Not listedGloria Romero (source for Lieutenant Governor) – Not listed– Not listedFiona Ma (source for Lieutenant Governor) – Not listedFiona Ma (source for Lieutenant Governor) – Not listedSecretary of State Read more: CalMatters voter guide (opens in a new tab) · Los Angeles Times voter guide (opens in a new tab)
Shirley Weber · 23 groups
One square per group. A group backing two candidates counts for each.
Filtered: 56 of 56 endorsers
Report an error in Secretary of State – Not listed– Not listed– Not listedShirley Weber (source for Secretary of State) Checked October 5 Shirley Weber (source for Secretary of State) Shirley Weber (source for Secretary of State) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listedShirley Weber (source for Secretary of State) Shirley Weber (source for Secretary of State) Checked October 2 Shirley Weber (source for Secretary of State) Don Wagner (source for Secretary of State) – Not listedDon Wagner (source for Secretary of State) Checked October 8 Shirley Weber (source for Secretary of State) Checked October 8 – Not listed– Not listed– Not listedShirley Weber (source for Secretary of State, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com Shirley Weber (source for Secretary of State) – Not listed– Not listedShirley Weber (source for Secretary of State) Shirley Weber (source for Secretary of State) Don Wagner (source for Secretary of State) Shirley Weber (source for Secretary of State) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listedShirley Weber (source for Secretary of State) Shirley Weber (source for Secretary of State) Shirley Weber (source for Secretary of State) Checked October 7 Don Wagner (source for Secretary of State) Checked October 7 Shirley Weber (source for Secretary of State) – Not listedShirley Weber (source for Secretary of State, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com Checked October 5 Shirley Weber (source for Secretary of State) Checked October 11 – Not listed– Not listedShirley Weber (source for Secretary of State) – Not listedShirley Weber (source for Secretary of State) – Not listed– Not listedShirley Weber (source for Secretary of State) – Not listedShirley Weber (source for Secretary of State) – Not listedShirley Weber (source for Secretary of State) – Not listedController Read more: CalMatters voter guide (opens in a new tab) · Los Angeles Times voter guide (opens in a new tab)
One square per group. A group backing two candidates counts for each.
Filtered: 56 of 56 endorsers
Report an error in Controller – Not listed– Not listed– Not listedMalia Cohen (source for Controller) Checked October 5 Malia Cohen (source for Controller) Malia Cohen (source for Controller) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listedMalia Cohen (source for Controller) Malia Cohen (source for Controller) Checked October 2 Malia Cohen (source for Controller) Herb Morgan (source for Controller) Malia Cohen (source for Controller, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com Herb Morgan (source for Controller) Checked October 8 Malia Cohen (source for Controller) Checked October 8 – Not listed– Not listed– Not listedMalia Cohen (source for Controller, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com Malia Cohen (source for Controller) – Not listed– Not listedMalia Cohen (source for Controller) Malia Cohen (source for Controller) Herb Morgan (source for Controller) Malia Cohen (source for Controller) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listedMalia Cohen (source for Controller) Malia Cohen (source for Controller) Malia Cohen (source for Controller) Checked October 7 Herb Morgan (source for Controller) Checked October 7 Malia Cohen (source for Controller) – Not listedMalia Cohen (source for Controller, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com Checked October 5 Malia Cohen (source for Controller) Checked October 11 – Not listed– Not listedNo endorsement (source for Controller) – Not listedMalia Cohen (source for Controller) – Not listedHerb Morgan (source for Controller) Malia Cohen (source for Controller) – Not listedMalia Cohen (source for Controller) – Not listedMalia Cohen (source for Controller) – Not listedTreasurer Read more: CalMatters voter guide (opens in a new tab) · Los Angeles Times voter guide (opens in a new tab)
Eleni Kounalakis · 19 groups
Eleni Kounilakis · 1 group
Jennifer Hawks · 4 groups
No endorsement · 2 groups
One square per group. A group backing two candidates counts for each.
Filtered: 56 of 56 endorsers
Report an error in Treasurer – Not listed– Not listed– Not listedEleni Kounilakis (source for Treasurer) Checked October 5 Eleni Kounalakis (source for Treasurer) Eleni Kounalakis (source for Treasurer) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listedEleni Kounalakis (source for Treasurer) Eleni Kounalakis (source for Treasurer) Checked October 2 Eleni Kounalakis (source for Treasurer) Jennifer Hawks (source for Treasurer) – Not listedJennifer Hawks (source for Treasurer) Checked October 8 – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listedEleni Kounalakis (source for Treasurer, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com Eleni Kounalakis (source for Treasurer) – Not listed– Not listedEleni Kounalakis (source for Treasurer) No endorsement (source for Treasurer) – Not listedEleni Kounalakis (source for Treasurer) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listedEleni Kounalakis (source for Treasurer) Eleni Kounalakis (source for Treasurer) Eleni Kounalakis (source for Treasurer) Checked October 7 Jennifer Hawks (source for Treasurer) Checked October 7 Eleni Kounalakis (source for Treasurer) – Not listedEleni Kounalakis (source for Treasurer, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com Checked October 5 Eleni Kounalakis (source for Treasurer) Checked October 11 – Not listed– Not listedNo endorsement (source for Treasurer) – Not listedEleni Kounalakis (source for Treasurer) – Not listedJennifer Hawks (source for Treasurer) Eleni Kounalakis (source for Treasurer) – Not listedEleni Kounalakis (source for Treasurer) – Not listedEleni Kounalakis (source for Treasurer) – Not listedAttorney General Read more: CalMatters voter guide (opens in a new tab) · Los Angeles Times voter guide (opens in a new tab)
One square per group. A group backing two candidates counts for each.
Filtered: 56 of 56 endorsers
Report an error in Attorney General – Not listed– Not listed– Not listedRob Bonta (source for Attorney General) Checked October 5 Rob Bonta (source for Attorney General) Rob Bonta (source for Attorney General) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listedRob Bonta (source for Attorney General) Rob Bonta (source for Attorney General) Checked October 2 Rob Bonta (source for Attorney General) Michael Gates (source for Attorney General) Rob Bonta (source for Attorney General, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com Michael Gates (source for Attorney General) Checked October 8 Rob Bonta (source for Attorney General) Checked October 8 – Not listed– Not listed– Not listedRob Bonta (source for Attorney General, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com Rob Bonta (source for Attorney General) – Not listed– Not listedRob Bonta (source for Attorney General) Rob Bonta (source for Attorney General) Michael Gates (source for Attorney General) Rob Bonta (source for Attorney General) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listedRob Bonta (source for Attorney General) Checked October 7 Rob Bonta (source for Attorney General) Rob Bonta (source for Attorney General) Rob Bonta (source for Attorney General) Checked October 7 Michael Gates (source for Attorney General) Checked October 7 Rob Bonta (source for Attorney General) – Not listedRob Bonta (source for Attorney General, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com Checked October 5 Rob Bonta (source for Attorney General) Checked October 11 – Not listed– Not listedNo endorsement (source for Attorney General) – Not listed– Not listedRob Bonta (source for Attorney General) Michael Gates (source for Attorney General) Rob Bonta (source for Attorney General) – Not listedRob Bonta (source for Attorney General) – Not listedRob Bonta (source for Attorney General) – Not listedInsurance Commissioner Read more: CalMatters voter guide (opens in a new tab) · Los Angeles Times voter guide (opens in a new tab)
No recommendation · 1 group
One square per group. A group backing two candidates counts for each.
Filtered: 56 of 56 endorsers
Report an error in Insurance Commissioner – Not listedJane Kim (source for Insurance Commissioner) – Not listedBen Allen (source for Insurance Commissioner) Checked October 5 Jane Kim (source for Insurance Commissioner) Ben Allen (source for Insurance Commissioner) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listedJane Kim (source for Insurance Commissioner) Ben Allen (source for Insurance Commissioner) Checked October 2 Jane Kim (source for Insurance Commissioner) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listedJane Kim (source for Insurance Commissioner) Ben Allen (source for Insurance Commissioner, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com Ben Allen (source for Insurance Commissioner) – Not listed– Not listedBen Allen (source for Insurance Commissioner) Jane Kim (source for Insurance Commissioner) – Not listedJane Kim (source for Insurance Commissioner) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listedJane Kim (source for Insurance Commissioner) No recommendation (source for Insurance Commissioner) Jane Kim (source for Insurance Commissioner) Checked October 7 – Not listedJane Kim (source for Insurance Commissioner) – Not listedBen Allen (source for Insurance Commissioner, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com Checked October 5 Ben Allen (source for Insurance Commissioner) Checked October 11 – Not listed– Not listedJane Kim (source for Insurance Commissioner) Jane Kim (source for Insurance Commissioner) Jane Kim (source for Insurance Commissioner) – Not listed– Not listedBen Allen (source for Insurance Commissioner) – Not listedBen Allen (source for Insurance Commissioner) – Not listedJane Kim (source for Insurance Commissioner) – Not listedBoard of Equalization, District 2 One square per group. A group backing two candidates counts for each.
Filtered: 56 of 56 endorsers
Report an error in Board of Equalization, District 2 John Pimentel (source for Board of Equalization, District 2) – Not listed– Not listedSally Lieber (source for Board of Equalization, District 2) Checked October 5 Sally Lieber (source for Board of Equalization, District 2) Sally Lieber (source for Board of Equalization, District 2) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listedSally Lieber (source for Board of Equalization, District 2) Sally Lieber (source for Board of Equalization, District 2) Checked October 2 Sally Lieber (source for Board of Equalization, District 2) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listedSally Lieber (source for Board of Equalization, District 2) Checked October 8 – Not listed– Not listed– Not listedJohn Pimentel (source for Board of Equalization, District 2, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com John Pimentel (source for Board of Equalization, District 2) – Not listed– Not listedJohn Pimentel (source for Board of Equalization, District 2) Sally Lieber (source for Board of Equalization, District 2) John Pimentel (source for Board of Equalization, District 2) Sally Lieber (source for Board of Equalization, District 2) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listedSally Lieber (source for Board of Equalization, District 2) Sally Lieber (source for Board of Equalization, District 2) Sally Lieber (source for Board of Equalization, District 2) Checked October 7 – Not listedSally Lieber (source for Board of Equalization, District 2) – Not listed– Not listedSally Lieber (source for Board of Equalization, District 2) Checked October 11 – Not listed– Not listedSally Lieber (source for Board of Equalization, District 2) – Not listedSally Lieber (source for Board of Equalization, District 2) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listedSally Lieber (source for Board of Equalization, District 2) – Not listedSally Lieber (source for Board of Equalization, District 2) – Not listedState Assembly, District 14 No endorsement · 2 groups
One square per group. A group backing two candidates counts for each.
Filtered: 56 of 56 endorsers
Report an error in State Assembly, District 14 – Not listed– Not listed– Not listedBuffy Wicks (source for State Assembly, District 14) Checked October 5 No endorsement (source for State Assembly, District 14) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listedBuffy Wicks (source for State Assembly, District 14) Buffy Wicks (source for State Assembly, District 14) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listedBuffy Wicks (source for State Assembly, District 14) Checked October 8 – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listedBuffy Wicks (source for State Assembly, District 14) – Not listed– Not listedBuffy Wicks (source for State Assembly, District 14) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listedNo endorsement (source for State Assembly, District 14) – Not listedSuperintendent of Public Instruction Read more: CalMatters voter guide (opens in a new tab) · Los Angeles Times voter guide (opens in a new tab)
Richard Barrera · 21 groups
One square per group. A group backing two candidates counts for each.
Filtered: 56 of 56 endorsers
Report an error in Superintendent of Public Instruction – Not listedRichard Barrera (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction) – Not listedRichard Barrera (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction) Checked October 5 Richard Barrera (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction) Richard Barrera (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listedRichard Barrera (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction) Richard Barrera (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction) Checked October 2 – Not listedSonja Shaw (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction) – Not listedSonja Shaw (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction) Checked October 8 – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listedRichard Barrera (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction) – Not listed– Not listedRichard Barrera (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction) Richard Barrera (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction) Sonja Shaw (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction) Richard Barrera (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listedRichard Barrera (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction) Richard Barrera (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction) Richard Barrera (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction) Checked October 7 Sonia Shaw (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction) Checked October 7 Richard Barrera (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction) – Not listedRichard Barrera (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com Checked October 5 Richard Barrera (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction) Checked October 11 – Not listed– Not listedRichard Barrera (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction) – Not listedNo endorsement (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction) – Not listedSonja Shaw (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction) Richard Barrera (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction) – Not listedRichard Barrera (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction) Richard Barrera (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction) Richard Barrera (source for Superintendent of Public Instruction) – Not listedProp 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds Read more: CalMatters voter guide (opens in a new tab) · Los Angeles Times voter guide (opens in a new tab)
29 groups say Yes. 3 say No.
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✗ ✗ ✗ –
✓ 29 Yes ✗ 3 No – 1 No position
Filtered: 56 of 56 endorsers
Report an error in Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) Checked October 5 ✓ Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) Checked October 2 ✓ Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) – Neutral (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) Checked October 8 – Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com ✓ Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) – Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) ✗ No (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) – Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) Checked October 7 – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) Checked October 11 ✗ No (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) – Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 1 – Housing affordability / veterans bonds) – Not listedProp 2 – Increase rainy day fund Read more: CalMatters voter guide (opens in a new tab) · Los Angeles Times voter guide (opens in a new tab)
25 groups say Yes. 4 say No.
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ – –
✓ 25 Yes ✗ 4 No – 2 No position
Filtered: 56 of 56 endorsers
Report an error in Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund – Not listed– Neutral (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) Checked October 5 ✓ Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) Checked October 2 – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com ✗ No (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) Checked October 8 – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com ✓ Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) – Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) ✗ No (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) – Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) Checked October 7 – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) – Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) Checked October 11 ✗ No (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) – Not listed– No position (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 2 – Increase rainy day fund) – Not listedProp 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care Read more: CalMatters voter guide (opens in a new tab) · Los Angeles Times voter guide (opens in a new tab)
33 groups say Yes. 3 say No.
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✗ ✗ ✗
✓ 33 Yes ✗ 3 No – 0 No position
Filtered: 56 of 56 endorsers
Report an error in Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) Checked October 5 ✓ Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) Checked October 2 ✓ Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) ✗ No (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com ✗ No (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) Checked October 8 – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com ✓ Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) – Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) ✗ No (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) Checked October 7 – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com Checked October 5 ✓ Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) Checked October 11 ✓ Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 3 – High-earner income tax for education & health care) – Not listedProp 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns Read more: CalMatters voter guide (opens in a new tab) · Los Angeles Times voter guide (opens in a new tab)
30 groups say Yes. 5 say No.
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗
✓ 30 Yes ✗ 5 No – 0 No position
Filtered: 56 of 56 endorsers
Report an error in Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) Checked October 5 ✓ Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) Checked October 2 ✓ Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) ✗ No (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com ✗ No (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) Checked October 8 – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com ✗ No (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) – Not listed– Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) ✗ No (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) Checked October 7 – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) – Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) Checked October 11 ✓ Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) – Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 4 – Allow public financing of campaigns) – Not listedProp 5 – Recall process for statewide officers Read more: CalMatters voter guide (opens in a new tab) · Los Angeles Times voter guide (opens in a new tab)
29 groups say Yes. 4 say No.
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗
✓ 29 Yes ✗ 4 No – 0 No position
Filtered: 56 of 56 endorsers
Report an error in Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) Checked October 5 ✓ Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) Checked October 2 – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com ✗ No (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) Checked October 8 – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com ✓ Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) – Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) ✗ No (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) – Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) Checked October 7 – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) – Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) Checked October 11 ✗ No (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) – Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 5 – Recall process for statewide officers) – Not listedProp 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program Read more: CalMatters voter guide (opens in a new tab) · Los Angeles Times voter guide (opens in a new tab)
19 groups say Yes. 6 say No.
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ – – – – – –
✓ 19 Yes ✗ 6 No – 6 No position
Filtered: 56 of 56 endorsers
Report an error in Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) Checked October 5 ✓ Yes (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) – Not listed– Neutral (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) Checked October 2 – Not listed– Neutral (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com ✗ No (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) Checked October 8 – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com ✓ Yes (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) – Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) – No position (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) ✗ No (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) – Not listed– Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) – Vote your values (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) Checked October 7 – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com Checked October 5 ✓ Yes (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) Checked October 11 ✗ No (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) – Not listed– No position (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) ✗ No (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) – Not listed– No recommendation (source for Prop 37 – Middle-class homeownership loan program) – Not listedProp 38 – Immunology research bonds Read more: CalMatters voter guide (opens in a new tab) · Los Angeles Times voter guide (opens in a new tab)
10 groups say Yes. 15 say No.
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ –
✓ 10 Yes ✗ 15 No – 1 No position
Filtered: 56 of 56 endorsers
Report an error in Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds) Checked October 5 – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds) Checked October 2 – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds) ✗ No (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com ✗ No (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds) Checked October 8 – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds) – Not listed– Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds) ✗ No (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds) ✗ No (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com Checked October 5 ✓ Yes (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds) Checked October 11 ✗ No (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds) – No position (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds) ✗ No (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 38 – Immunology research bonds) – Not listedProp 39 – Voter ID Read more: CalMatters voter guide (opens in a new tab) · Los Angeles Times voter guide (opens in a new tab)
4 groups say Yes. 33 say No.
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗
✓ 4 Yes ✗ 33 No – 0 No position
Filtered: 56 of 56 endorsers
Report an error in Prop 39 – Voter ID – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) ✗ No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) ✗ No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) Checked October 5 ✗ No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) ✗ No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) ✗ No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) ✗ No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) ✗ No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) Checked October 2 ✗ No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) ✗ No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com ✓ Yes (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) Checked October 8 – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com ✗ No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) – Not listed– Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) ✗ No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) ✗ No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) ✗ No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) ✗ No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) ✗ No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) Checked October 7 – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) – Not listed– Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) Checked October 11 ✗ No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) ✗ No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) ✗ No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) ✗ No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) ✗ No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) ✗ No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 39 – Voter ID) – Not listedProp 40 – Billionaire tax Read more: CalMatters voter guide (opens in a new tab) · Los Angeles Times voter guide (opens in a new tab)
20 groups say Yes. 10 say No.
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ – – – –
✓ 20 Yes ✗ 10 No – 4 No position
Filtered: 56 of 56 endorsers
Report an error in Prop 40 – Billionaire tax – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) Checked October 5 ✓ Yes (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) – Not listed– No endorsement (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) Checked October 2 ✓ Yes (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) ✗ No (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) ✗ No (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com ✗ No (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) Checked October 8 – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com ✗ No (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) ✗ No (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) ✗ No (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) – Not listed– Neutral (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) Checked October 7 – Not listed– Neutral (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) – Not listed– Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) Checked October 11 ✓ Yes (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– No recommendation (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) ✗ No (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) – Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 40 – Billionaire tax) – Not listedProp 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits Read more: CalMatters voter guide (opens in a new tab) · Los Angeles Times voter guide (opens in a new tab)
5 groups say Yes. 29 say No.
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ –
✓ 5 Yes ✗ 29 No – 1 No position
Filtered: 56 of 56 endorsers
Report an error in Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) Checked October 5 ✗ No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) ✗ No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) ✗ No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) ✗ No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) ✗ No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) Checked October 2 ✗ No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com ✓ Yes (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) Checked October 8 – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com ✗ No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) – Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) ✗ No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) ✗ No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) ✗ No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) ✗ No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) ✗ No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) Checked October 7 – Not listed– Neutral (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com Checked October 5 ✗ No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) Checked October 11 ✗ No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) ✗ No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) ✗ No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) ✗ No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 41 – State tax limits / special tax audits) – Not listedProp 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings Read more: CalMatters voter guide (opens in a new tab) · Los Angeles Times voter guide (opens in a new tab)
6 groups say Yes. 28 say No.
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ –
✓ 6 Yes ✗ 28 No – 1 No position
Filtered: 56 of 56 endorsers
Report an error in Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) Checked October 5 ✗ No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) ✗ No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) ✗ No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) ✗ No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) ✗ No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) Checked October 2 ✗ No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com ✓ Yes (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) Checked October 8 – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com ✓ Yes (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) – Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) ✗ No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) ✗ No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) ✗ No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) ✗ No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) ✗ No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) Checked October 7 – Not listed– Neutral (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com Checked October 5 ✗ No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) Checked October 11 ✗ No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) ✗ No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) ✗ No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) ✗ No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 42 – Limits state taxes on personal property/savings) – Not listedProp 43 – Limits local revenue measures Read more: CalMatters voter guide (opens in a new tab) · Los Angeles Times voter guide (opens in a new tab)
5 groups say Yes. 31 say No.
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗
✓ 5 Yes ✗ 31 No – 0 No position
Filtered: 56 of 56 endorsers
Report an error in Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) Checked October 5 ✗ No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) ✗ No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) ✗ No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) ✗ No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) ✗ No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) Checked October 2 ✗ No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) ✗ No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com ✓ Yes (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) Checked October 8 – Not listed– Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com ✓ Yes (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) – Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) ✗ No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) ✗ No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) ✗ No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) ✗ No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) ✗ No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) Checked October 7 – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) – Not listed– Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) Checked October 11 ✗ No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) ✗ No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) ✗ No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) – Not listed– Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) ✗ No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) ✗ No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 43 – Limits local revenue measures) – Not listedProp 44 – Clinic spending requirements Read more: CalMatters voter guide (opens in a new tab) · Los Angeles Times voter guide (opens in a new tab)
5 groups say Yes. 25 say No.
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ – –
✓ 5 Yes ✗ 25 No – 2 No position
Filtered: 56 of 56 endorsers
Report an error in Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) Checked October 5 ✓ Yes (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) ✗ No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) ✗ No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) ✗ No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) ✗ No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) Checked October 2 – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) ✗ No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com ✗ No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) Checked October 8 – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com ✗ No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) – Not listed– Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) – No position (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) ✗ No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) – Not listed– Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) ✗ No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) Checked October 7 – Not listed– Neutral (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com Checked October 5 ✗ No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) Checked October 11 ✓ Yes (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) ✗ No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 44 – Clinic spending requirements) – Not listedProp 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes Read more: CalMatters voter guide (opens in a new tab) · Los Angeles Times voter guide (opens in a new tab)
5 groups say Yes. 27 say No.
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ –
✓ 5 Yes ✗ 27 No – 1 No position
Filtered: 56 of 56 endorsers
Report an error in Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) Checked October 5 ✗ No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) ✗ No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) ✗ No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) ✗ No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) ✗ No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) Checked October 2 ✗ No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) ✗ No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes, on sfendorsements.com) Via sfendorsements.com ✓ Yes (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) Checked October 8 – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) – Not listed– Not listed✓ Yes (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) ✗ No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) ✓ Yes (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) ✗ No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) ✗ No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) ✗ No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) ✗ No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) Checked October 7 – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) Checked October 11 ✗ No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) ✗ No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) ✗ No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) – Not listed– Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) – No recommendation (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) ✗ No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) – Not listed✗ No (source for Prop 45 – Environmental review (CEQA) changes) – Not listedSupreme Court retention (Groban, Evans) One square per group. A group backing two candidates counts for each.
Filtered: 56 of 56 endorsers
Report an error in Supreme Court retention (Groban, Evans) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listedRetain both (source for Supreme Court retention (Groban, Evans)) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listedRetain both (source for Supreme Court retention (Groban, Evans)) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listedCourt of Appeal, 1st District retention One square per group. A group backing two candidates counts for each.
Filtered: 56 of 56 endorsers
Report an error in Court of Appeal, 1st District retention – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listedRetain all (source for Court of Appeal, 1st District retention) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listedRetain all (source for Court of Appeal, 1st District retention) – Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed– Not listed